MacKenzie Rae Reads

The Pilot’s Wife does NOT save the drama for its mama, lemme tell ya! DRAMA DRAMA DRAMA. Drama out the yin yang. Filled to the brim. Imagine that really juicy cat fight that happened your junior year of high school… got it? Now multiple that by 12,000. SO MUCH DRAMA. However, this is one of those rare books that not only gets you with the plot points, but is also well written. Go figure. Think if Gossip Girls had been written by J.K. Rowling. Dynamite. Also… LOL. 

The Pilot’s Wife follows a wife’s journey after she learns that her husband, a pilot, has died in a plane crash. (It screams Oprah’s Book Club, because it is). Oh, but just you wait. It doesn’t stop there. This isn’t merely a fictionalized portrayal of the grief process, it’s juicy. Each page is filled with twists and turns, romance, betrayal, and anything and everything else emotionally exhausting. I don’t want to give anything away, so I’ll stop now. 

Why I Liked It:

1) Well Paced Suspense - Anita Shreve knows a thing or two about gripping a reader. Just when everything seems to be winding down… BAM! She hits you with another OMG. It’s like this the ENTIRE book. That’s a feat. 

2) Realistic Emotions - The main character, Kathryn, experiences every emotion on the gamut. I liked that Shreve was able to capture these emotions through Kathryn’s reactions to events, descriptions of situations, and interactions with her family, rather than naming each shift. She describes and weaves through each feeling without concretely defining them, while still triggering empathy from readers. 

I Didn’t Buy…

Some of the OMG moments. While some of the crazy twists are incredibly and devastatingly believable, I found that others were a stretch. Again, no spoilers here, but one of the last shockers revealed is sort of over the top. I thought she could have found a more plausible and relevant reason for the plane crash happening. 

RATING: 3.5 stars. When I finished reading this book a few weeks ago I would have given it 4. Looking back, however, I enjoyed it, but it wasn’t a favorite. It’s well-crafted and entertaining in a heart-wrenching way, but not for everyone.

Thoughts? Submit a response! 

<3 MacK

Happy Monday from Matilda!!

I am currently reading Emma by Jane Austen. I’m not entirely sold yet. I think it’s my least favorite of the 4 (S+S, P+P, MP) that I’ve read so far. 

(via noseinabook)

I’ve never enjoyed watching movies that much. Every once in a while I’m in the mood, but over all I’d much rather read for entertainment. That’s probably pretty obvious given the content of this blog. I’m not even that interested in seeing book adaptations in film. 99% of the time I like the book better, and 50% of the time the poorly executed movie diminishes my love for the book unfairly. Generally, I steer clear. 

When I read The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo 2.5 years ago, I was apparently the only person on the planet who didn’t get the appeal. Call me faint of heart, but I found nothing intriguing enough about the plot worth getting through the torture/brutal rape scenes. I also found the characters flat, and the pacing weird. Slooooooooow then fast! Slllllllllllllooooooooooow then fast! Granted I didn’t read the whole series, but not my cup of tea. 

When I found out that the Rooney Mara/Daniel Craig blockbuster was in the makes, however, I was interested. Looking back I realized that a lot of what I didn’t like about the book was that it read like a movie script. I finally got around to seeing the film (another score from my library’s stacked DVD collection), and I LOVED IT. I REALLY REALLY LOVED IT. All the excess was trimmed out, and the actors brought the characters to life, filling in all of the gaps left out in the book. I can honestly say this is the first time I’ve ever liked the movie version BETTER than the book. Has this ever happened to you guys?

I will always love The Martian Chronicles. RIP Ray Bradbury.

Once every year or so I encounter a book that entrances me from its first sentence. The Poisonwood Bible is one of those books. Author Barbara Kingsolver tells the epic tale of the Price family - a mother and four young daughters led by their zealous, Baptist missionary father into the heart of the Belgian Congo in the 1959. Kingsolver crafts the Prices’ hardships and ultimate demise using such lush description and overwhelming emotion, I was locked in from the get go. 

Section 1 (or Genesis) begins, 

Imagine a ruin so strange it must never have happened.

First, picture the forest. I want you to be its conscience, the eyes in the trees. The trees are columns of slick, brindled bark like muscular animals overgrown beyond all reason. Every space is filled with life: delicate, poisonous frogs war-painted like skeletons, clutched in copulation, secreting their precious eggs onto dripping leaves. Vines strangling their own kin in the everlasting wrestle for sunlight. The breathing of monkeys. A glide of snake belly on branch…. The forest eats itself and lives forever.

Wow. Wow wow wow. I could dissect these few sentences for hours in complete reader’s ecstasy. It’s merely the beginning of our introduction to the setting, and yet we don’t need much more. This paragraph captures the vivacity, the power, the beauty, and the danger of the Belgian Congo. Africa is startlingly alive, luring the Prices in, but not without a fair warning. The opening also introduces the “glide of snake belly,” the grave omen repeated throughout the plot line. Finally, “war-painted like skeletons, clutched in copulation”… some of these lines are practically poetry! They deserve to be read out loud. Ahhhh, so much great stuff crammed in! This passage encapsulates exactly what Kingsolver does best - rich imagery, foreshadowing, and a mastery of language that’s nearly unbeatable. 

Other wonderfulness…  

1) Rotating narration - Kingsolver tells the story through the voices of all four Price daughters and their mother, Orleanna. Orleanna reflects back on her experience in the Congo from a relative present, while Rachel, Leah, Adah, and Ruth May move the plot along as it’s happening. Each girl holds a unique perspective, and knitted together as a whole they reveal an undeniably truthful account of their family’s destruction. I found myself looking forward most to Adah’s sections. She is a great example of a dynamic character - pessimistic, yet longing; mute, yet lover of words. 

2) History lessons - Soooo I must have missed the day we learned about African colonialism and struggle for independence in history class. (Or it isn’t really taught in American high schools, which I feel is more likely). Everything from Belgian control of the Congo to blood diamonds to dictators to American sponsorship of said dictators is covered in this book. The real genius, however, is that Kingsolver includes the Congo’s history from the viewpoints of both the first world countries (through Rachel and the Underdowns) and the Congolese (through Leah and Anatole). She also weaves it into the plot so seamlessly that you never feel like you’re reading huge chunks of historic explanations. Woo hoo!!

3) Nathan Price - Reverend Price is the kind of bad guy that you love to despise. Think Joffrey from Game of Thrones. Pure evil. HOWEVER, I think it’s interesting to explore the events and emotions that created Nathan… war trauma? Guilt? Fear?

I could talk about how much I love this book for days, but I must move on! The only thing I didn’t like about this novel is that the end drags on a bit.  After the climax, you’ve still got another 150 pages that read as a sort of epilogue, following the girls into adulthood. On one hand, it’s interesting to hear how the Congo shaped their lives. Kingsolver is particularly good at showing how Africa weaves itself into the girl’s very fibers, making it nearly impossible for them to return to normal American society. However, it’s a little dull and redundant. 

Even so, I give this book 5 stars of out 5. GO READ IT. 

Submit your thoughts on The Poisonwood Bible here! Follow me please! :)

<3 MacK